花费无数日夜和精力终于把论文写到自己觉得完美无瑕，满怀欢喜把论文投递出去。心想发表论文的过程肯定是轻松加愉快，小编只想说别做梦了！！！审稿人会让你感到满满的……
审稿人跟你的沟通要么热情诚恳，要么郑重其事，但是审稿人与期刊编辑之间的沟通就随意多了。你知道他们会聊些什么吗？接着往下看。《Environmental Microbiology》每年都会发布一份审稿意见集锦，让人在严谨的科研之余体会下审稿人的幽默与诙谐。这些审稿意见有的让人捧腹不禁，有的让人哭笑不得，今天列举了一些，各位看官不妨看看是否也曾收到过类似的审稿意见。1. Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!2. "Done! Difficult task, I don’t wish to think about constipation and faecal flora during my holidays! But, once a referee, always and anywhere a referee; we are good boy scouts in the research wilderness. Even under the sun and near a wonderful beach."搞定了！太不容易了。我才不想装着一脑子“粪便菌落”来度假。但是，一朝做了审稿人，这辈子都是审稿人。在科学研究的荒漠中我是勇敢的童子军。即使在洒满阳光的沙滩上也是。哼！3. "This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future."
这篇论文太烂了。请马上拒稿，然后封了作者的账号，免得他日后继续投稿。4. "The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about."
写作水平和数据展示让我整个人都不好了，我不得不提前下班，早点回家，甚至有点开始怀疑人生。5. "The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style."6. "The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student."7. "This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion."这篇论文写得太烂了。目的不明确，结论不合理。引文都是乱用的，跟正文的论证完全对不上。我严重怀疑这样的实验方法和数据是否能得出这样的有效结论。刚刚我们见识过了审稿人的毒舌，现在来见识一下审稿人怎么夸人。但当审稿人遇到非常棒的论文，也会给出衷心的好评。1. “Very much enjoyed reading this one, and do not have any significant comments. Wish I had thought of this one.”
这篇论文读起来简直是一种享受，没有任何意见。这么好的点子我当初怎么没想到！2. “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.”3. "This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report."这是我见过的最确凿的报告，许多人花更多时间精力写出来的比这个差多了。作为一篇翔实的报告，这是一个完美的例子。4. "It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish."
评审这样的稿件是件幸事，构思周详，实施得当，写得漂亮。干净，纯朴。看到这些审稿人意见后，不知道在科研路上的你收到过怎样的审稿意见呢？欢迎大家一起来分享自己曾收到过的审稿意见。
